Woman’s Body Found in Tote by Dumpster

A Colorado man was sentenced to 10 years in prison after prosecutors said he placed a 29-year-old woman’s body inside a plastic tote bin, covered it with bedding and left it near a dumpster at an Arvada apartment complex, a case that ended without a murder charge because the cause of death could not be determined.

The defendant, Daniel Ryan Clark, pleaded guilty to tampering with a deceased human body and admitted he disposed of Chelsea Beadles’ remains, according to prosecutors and court statements. Investigators said cell phone and social media records put Beadles with Clark in the hours before her death and that evidence tied him to the tote and bedding. But a forensic pathologist ruled the cause and manner of death “undetermined,” leaving prosecutors to pursue a case focused on what they said was proven: the handling and concealment of her body.

Arvada police were called to The Perch on 52nd apartment complex on Sept. 15, 2025, after a maintenance worker reported finding human remains near a dumpster enclosure, prosecutors said. Detectives identified the victim as Beadles, 29. Authorities said her body had been placed inside a plastic tote bin, was covered with bedding and showed numerous injuries. Prosecutors said the body was partially unclothed when it was discovered. The call brought police and investigators into a part of the complex that residents typically pass without noticing, turning a routine maintenance check into a homicide investigation with immediate questions and few clear answers.

Police and prosecutors have not released a detailed public timeline of Beadles’ final hours, but authorities said their investigation relied heavily on digital records. Investigators reviewed cell phone data and Facebook records and determined Beadles had been with Clark in the hours before she died, prosecutors said. They also gathered evidence that linked Clark to the tote bin and the bedding used to cover the remains. That combination of location data, communication records and physical evidence led the First Judicial District Attorney’s Office to file charges against Clark less than two weeks after the body was found.

On Sept. 24, 2025, Clark, 41, was charged with tampering with a deceased human body, a felony, and tampering with physical evidence, prosecutors said. Both charges centered on what authorities said happened after Beadles died: her body was placed in a container, covered and left near a dumpster. Investigators did not publicly accuse Clark of killing Beadles at that stage, and the case soon became a stark example of how charging decisions can hinge on medical findings that remain unresolved even after extensive investigative work.

The Jefferson County Coroner’s Office concluded the cause and manner of death were “undetermined,” prosecutors said. Dr. Dawn Holmes, a forensic pathologist, said there was no evidence of significant anatomic trauma, while also noting that a traumatic death could not be definitively excluded because the circumstances were unclear, prosecutors said. That ruling meant investigators could not say publicly whether Beadles died from violence, an overdose, a medical event, or another cause. Without a clear cause and manner, prosecutors said they could not support additional charges beyond the evidence related to disposing of the body.

The limits of the medical findings became central to the public outcome. Prosecutors said investigators thoroughly examined the circumstances of Beadles’ death and worked to determine how she died and whether anyone was criminally responsible. Still, they said the available evidence did not support homicide charges. The gap between what the family believed happened and what could be proven in court shaped the case’s final result, leaving a plea deal that provided a decade in prison but no formal finding about how Beadles died.

Clark’s guilty plea resolved the case just months after the discovery, and it came with a negotiated sentence. Prosecutors said the parties stipulated to a 10-year prison term in the Colorado Department of Corrections. By law, the tampering offense carries a sentencing range of four to 12 years, and the plea agreement set the punishment near the top of that range. Jefferson County District Court Judge Megan Miloud imposed the stipulated 10-year sentence, followed by a mandatory three years of parole, prosecutors said.

As part of the agreement, prosecutors dismissed the tampering with physical evidence charge, authorities said. The dismissal narrowed the case to a single count that reflected Clark’s admission that he disposed of Beadles’ body. Prosecutors have not detailed why they agreed to dismiss the second count, but plea negotiations in such cases often weigh the strength of proof, the likelihood of conviction at trial and the desire to secure a significant prison term without relitigating contested facts.

In court, Beadles’ family described a kind of grief that did not end with the sentence. Her mother told the judge her daughter was “a sweet soul” who trusted others and believed in the good in everyone, prosecutors said. She described the agony of not knowing what happened in Beadles’ final hours, paired with the trauma of how the body was found. “No parent should have to collect their child’s body from the trash,” she told the court, a line that drew attention far beyond the courtroom because it captured both the brutality of the discovery and the unanswered questions that remained.

Chief Deputy District Attorney Brenna Zortman acknowledged the family’s frustration and the limitations of the case, prosecutors said. Zortman said the punishment “feels so abysmally low for what happened,” while also telling the court she was sorry the office could not provide more information about Beadles’ death. The statement highlighted what prosecutors said was the core problem: investigators could prove the disposal of a body and tie evidence to Clark, but they could not prove beyond a reasonable doubt how Beadles died or who caused her death.

Zortman also credited the maintenance worker who found the tote and called police, prosecutors said, noting the discovery was the reason Beadles was located at all. Investigators often rely on chance discoveries in cases involving concealed bodies, and prosecutors said the case could have remained unsolved without that report. The discovery started a chain of evidence collection that included identifying the remains, documenting injuries, collecting bedding and container evidence, and building a digital record of Beadles’ last known contacts and movements.

Clark addressed the court and described his plea as taking responsibility for what he said he did, while denying he killed Beadles, according to prosecutors. “I’m owning up to the stuff I did,” he told the judge, prosecutors said. At the same time, he maintained he did not harm Beadles and said he did not remember much of what happened around the timeframe because of drug use. Prosecutors said Clark denied killing Beadles and disputed any role in her death beyond disposing of the body.

Authorities have not publicly described Beadles’ relationship with Clark in detail. The district attorney’s office said investigators used cell phone and Facebook records to establish the two were together in the hours before she died. In reporting on the case, Clark was described as an Arvada resident. The apartment complex where the body was found is located along West 52nd Avenue. Officials did not release a public description of whether Beadles lived at the complex, was visiting, or had another connection to the property.

The case also underscored how visible injuries do not always translate into a chargeable homicide. Prosecutors said Beadles’ body had numerous injuries and was partially unclothed, details that can suggest violence or a struggle. But the coroner’s inability to determine cause and manner of death limited what prosecutors could argue in court. For investigators, that can mean a case remains suspended between suspicion and proof, where evidence may suggest wrongdoing but cannot be tied to a specific criminal act beyond the concealment of the body.

The charge Clark pleaded guilty to is designed to punish the mishandling or concealment of human remains, and it often appears in cases where a body is moved, hidden, dismembered, or otherwise treated in a way that obstructs discovery or investigation. In this case, prosecutors said Beadles’ remains were placed in a tote and covered with bedding near a dumpster. Even without a homicide conviction, the plea established that a court found Clark criminally responsible for the disposal. It also created a prison term that prosecutors framed as a measure of accountability in a case where other answers were not available.

For Beadles’ family, the outcome left grief mixed with unresolved questions. Her mother’s statement in court focused not only on the loss but on the manner of discovery and the enduring uncertainty about what happened. Prosecutors said the family will continue to live without a full explanation of Beadles’ final hours. That uncertainty is common in “undetermined” cases, where even extensive forensic testing and interviews cannot narrow a death to a definitive cause, leaving families and communities with an incomplete story.

The sentencing also drew attention in the Denver area because it involved a significant prison term without a murder conviction, a result that can be difficult for the public to understand. Prosecutors said they pursued the strongest case supported by the evidence and medical findings. They emphasized that investigators worked to determine whether anyone was criminally responsible for Beadles’ death and that no additional charges were supported. The result, they said, was a plea that avoided trial while securing a lengthy sentence for the conduct that could be proven in court.

Clark is expected to serve his sentence in the Colorado Department of Corrections and will face a mandatory parole term after release, prosecutors said. Beyond that, officials have not announced further investigative steps, and they have not said whether new evidence could change the case. For now, the court record reflects a conviction for tampering with a deceased human body, a decade-long prison sentence, and a family left asking the same question the coroner’s report could not answer: how Chelsea Beadles died.

Author note: Last updated February 18, 2026.